
Not everyone though. Today's Observer carries a hugely misleading story entitled 'Tory-Lib Dem coalition threatened by secret hardline memo on Europe.' I know a lot of Sunday papers' scoops don't contain a lot of beef, but this one takes serious liberties with the truth. Firstly, you have to read to the end of the story before being told that "This is a draft paper, drawn up by FCO officials on their own initiative as part of the civil service's normal and private contingency planning...the document was not shown to any representative of the Conservative party... "
So quite how this can be a 'draft letter by William Hague', as the article headline states, isn't clear. Secondly, despite some tangential suggestions about general Lib Dem policies on Europe and some criticism of Gordon Brown by John Mann MP, there is no comment from the Lib Dems, so it's hard to find anything to back up the assertion that they are spooked by this in any way.
When an article states two definite propositions; one that a memo is from the Conservative party when it isn't and two; that the talks between the parties have been threatened by said memo when they haven't, there is a strong argument that the article shouldn't have been run.
Under normal circumstances, you could just put this down to the usual Sunday paper inflation of gossip. Under current circumstances, there is a serious question over what sort of editorial propriety allows such a vacuous piece to be run at such a sensitive time with the only apparent aim being to force a breakdown in talks. Someone at the Observer should take a long hard look at their journalistic integrity.
No comments:
Post a Comment